Last semester, for Eric Daigre's teaching practicum (a required course for all graduate students with TAships in the English Department), we were instructed to write 5 "journal entries" about various topics related to teaching. He supplied us with a few prompts, noting that we could write about any of them whenever we wanted to, just as long as we answered each one. As I perused the list, I knew which one I was going to have the toughest time with: "Think back to your undergraduate experience. Who was your most inspiring professor? What classroom practices did he/she enact that made him/her so inspirational?." I dreaded answering this question, because I, in fact, had not a single inspiring professor throughout my undergraduate education - something I hate to admit, given the fact that I have a lot of love and pride for my alma mater.
I wish that I had already read bell hooks' essay(s) in Teaching to Transgress before I penned my acerbic response to the aforementioned prompt, because it was comforting to hear that none of her professors had teaching styles she sought to emulate, either. Maybe I could have pinpointed the issue with my lack of amazing professors: none of them had an interest in self-actualization, and that runs completely opposite to my teaching philosophy, the cornerstone of which is making my students feel confident, prepared and supported. hooks says that teaching is a performative act, something I adamantly agree with, but I also think it should be a transformative act - not just for the students, but for the teacher, as well (I think/know she would agree with me here). I think enthusiasm is grossly underrated in higher education, so that's something I want to continue focusing on throughout the course of this semester: how can my actions, my mind/body/spirit, my politics, my knowledge(s), influence the success or failure of my students' knowledge(s) being "enriched" and/or "enhanced?"
Moreover, and perhaps more importantly, I want to begin to seriously engage the critical aspect of critical pedagogy in this class. I want to interrogate how my assumptions impact my teaching practices and classroom behaviors/environments, and how/why these might change. I want to examine how and why I have capitulated to dominant classroom practices in the past, and how I can productively disrupt such structures to benefit both my students and myself. As I said in our first class, I especially want to think about this in terms of being a TA/discussion leader, as I find this position much more difficult than teaching a stand-alone course. When the course isn't your "own," you only see your students for 50 minutes a week, and there are already so many assumed practices and power relations at work, how can we encourage self-actualization and student agency in the classroom? Is this even an appropriate space for such an act? Is any learning space not?
I, too, wish I'd read hooks some time ago! I find it troubling sometimes to look back at my first few attempts at teaching and wonder why I did "what was expected" even when it was something I hated. No more!! :) Liked your blog.
ReplyDeletehooks keeps me sane. 'I LOVED Pitt, and I had really, really good teachers (one who guided me to become a master luthier loaned me a 1610 Marco Sicculo Italian harpsichord to repair and copy--it was probably worth $100k--what TRUST!). But 'inspiring' miscasts the relationship in my view--makes it a matter of charisma and unmanaged counter-transference. I want them to love learning, think critically, see the structure in their lives, make something original, and, and, and--but I don't give a damn if they're inspired by me. It just can't be about me....
ReplyDelete